Net op een ander forum een bericht gelezen wat ik hier ook wel even wil melden.
Er is een onderzoek gedaan door een aantal studenten van de faculteit Archeologie aan de Universiteit te Leiden.
Hierin is onderzoek gedaan naar de illegale verkoop van voorwerpen die archeologische waarden hebben.
Hierin zijn een aantal site's en forums bekeken. Waaronder Pieppiep en ook Jozef Hermans site en forum. Hierbij de link naar het dokument en hier volgen enkele stukjes uit dat onderzoek:
"The answer to the additional question that has been answered above, can be seen as an advice to the Cultural Heritage Inspectorate.
It has become clear that the Internet contributes to the selling of archaeological objects on a tremendous scale. At the moment, the nature and the size of archaeological objects offered on private websites are nevertheless of such a marginal degree that immediate actions are not necessary. When actions turn out to be necessary in the future (for example because of an increase of the e-commerce), the primary focus should be on the Internet forums. The soft spots of these forums, the closed character and difficult accessibility, are important features to consider in the fight against the illicit
trade of cultural goods. By keeping an eye on changes taking place it is very possible to counter any problems and threats that might rise in the near future.
A more important means to fight the (illicit) e-commerce of archaeological objects is to first raise awareness by the general public and the buyers and dealers of archaeological objects. Although professional dealers may know that what they are doing is wrong, it is the question if this is also the case with (individual) dealers that are active on private websites. Informing the users of the websites that it is prohibited to sell cultural property can be a first step in getting a better view of the e-commerce of archaeological objects. Also, the importance of official organizations and databases as ARCHIS and NUMIS should be underlined."
Ook dit:Personal note of the researchers
On a personal note, we were quite surprised to see such an amount of archaeological goods being dealt and sold online. Especially considering how ‘open’ some of these people are: plotting pieces of land and selling objects for a low amount of money without any shame or even any realization that they are harming the Dutch cultural heritage. The fact that some of the Internet forums were shielded off from the public raised our concern. We suspect that a lot more is being dealt and sold than is officially made clear. As archaeologists in the making, we sincerely hope that this research will raise awareness to do whatever possible in order to prevent the (illicit) trade of cultural goods online for the protection of our cultural heritage and raise importance amongst others on the value of archaeological goods.
Veel leesplezier.
Maar ook jij Jozef zit in het verdachte bankje...... wat is daarop je antwoord?
Best triest om wat musketkogels aan te merken als archeologisch waardevol.........
groeten Kadan.
http://www.erfgoedinspectie.nl/uploads/publications/ecommerce_and_archaeology__an_investigation_into_the_supply_and_demand_of_dutch_archaeological_objects_on_the_internet.pdfik weet niet of we dit al te serieus moeten nemen.
